Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Heath Williams
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Thompson v. Veech et al
as 4:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Frank Veech, Sgt. JoJo Thornton and Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
General Star Indemnity Co et al v. LB Commercial Roofing LLC
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Co, Thompson Heath and Bond Ltd, First Speciality Ins Corp and others
Defendant:
LB Commercial Roofing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ellis v. Winfrey
as 4:2021cv00547
Petitioner:
Jabari Akil Ellis
Respondent:
Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. Winfrey
as 4:2021cv00548
Petitioner:
Donald Hunter Ellis
Respondent:
Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Skinner v. Winfrey et al
as 4:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Heath Winfrey and Robin Livingston
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Skinner v. Livingston
as 4:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Skinner
Defendant:
Robin Livingston and Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc., Oklahoma Sheriffs'Association, The, Jason Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
