Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dewey v. Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies et al
as 5:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewey
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies, Abel Gonzales, Anita Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield, Cordell Police Dept and Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neconish v. Seminole County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ray Neconish
Defendant:
Seminole County Jail, Seminole County Sherriffs Dept and Mike LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brakebill v. Teal et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brakebill
Defendant:
Ronald Teal, Richard Tyler, Mike Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Wilkie, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stocking v. Hall et al
as 5:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Bernie Scott Stocking
Defendant:
Tristen Hall and Cherokee Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv01168
Plaintiff:
Alvin Parker
Defendant:
Director Scott Crow and Okla Dept of Corr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hodges v. Oklahoma Co Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Oklahoma Police Dept and Oklahoma Co Jail
Plaintiff:
Armanie Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
