Cases 101 - 110 of 366
KEYES v. WILSON et al
as 2:2018cv04694
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAM WILSON, DARLENE HARRIS and DONALD TRUMP
Plaintiff:
KEYSEAN L. KEYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLE v. CARSON et al
as 2:2018cv03668
Defendant:
AMAZON INC AND/OR CORP., T.M.G. PUBLISHING FIRM, RODNEY "FROG" CARSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL v. STROUSE et al
as 5:2018cv03490
Defendant:
ANNETTE STROUSE, JOSEPH EUGENE NAGY and LYNN A. STROUSE
Counter Defendant:
JAMES DODD-O, THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, MICHAEL BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOMORO v. DAILY NEWS, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv03229
Defendant:
TRONC, INC. and DAILY NEWS, L.P.
Plaintiff:
DIANA LOMORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL v. STROUSE et al
as 5:2018cv03481
Counter Defendant:
DR. ANDREA REZNIK and THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP
Defendant:
ANNETTE STROUSE, JOSEPH EUGENE NAGY and LYNN A. STROUSE
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MELVIN v. SUNOCO EMPLOYEE SHOHEL
as 2:2018cv02740
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MICHAEL MELVIN, JR.
Defendant:
SUNOCO EMPLOYEE SHOHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSHING v. SEPTA
as 2:2018cv02665
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL RUSHING
Defendant:
SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARQUARDT v. INNOVEL SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 5:2018cv02652
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MARQUARDT
Defendant:
INNOVEL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRAWFORD et al v. WHOSEYOURLANDLORD,INC et al
as 2:2018cv01784
Plaintiff:
PETER CRAWFORD and CRAWFORD DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
WHOSEYOURLANDLORD, INC., OFO EZEUGWU, FELIX ADDISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOAH BANK et al v. SUNDAY JOURNAL USA CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv01413
Plaintiff:
NOAH BANK and EDWARD SHIN
Defendant:
SUNDAY JOURNAL USA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
