Cases 1 - 10 of 21
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORNEGEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE KORNEGEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS , LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEBEAU v. RAITH et al
as 2:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN LEBEAU
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. RAITH , DANIELLE HIBBERD , CHRISTINE KATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARGIONE et al v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2016cv05878
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. FARGIONE and JUDY L. PAVELKO
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY, JANINE DONATE, JOHN/JANE DOE MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEHRET et al v. TRACHTA et al
as 5:2016cv02175
Plaintiff:
TREVOR GEHRET , JEREMY PETERS and DANIEL LOGOTHETIS
Defendant:
THOMAS TRACHTA, DANIEL TROXELL, CARL STYRE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO v. LAXTON et al
as 5:2015cv04033
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW LAXTON, BLAKE KUNTZ, ANTHONY C. LEARDI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES BERRIOS v. SWEENEY et al
as 5:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
SHEILA FLORES BERRIOS
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY , DALE MEISEL , JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. LAMONT et al
as 5:2014cv03733
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BUTLER
Defendant:
CONRAD LAMONT, JOHN/JANE DOE GUARDS #1-X, JOHN/JANE DOE SUPERVISORS #1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
