Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Jenkins v. Marsh et al
as 2:2020cv04191
Respondent:
Judge Charles Erhlich, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, District Attorney Lawrence Krasner and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. MARSH et al
as 2:2020cv04154
Respondent:
GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, CHARLES EHRLICH, LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Marsh
as 2:2020cv03676
Respondent:
ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. BOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv01115
Defendant:
SUSAN KEESLER, JAMES SCHUCK, KATE MCDERMOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2019cv05474
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Defendant:
A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO, GOV. TOM WOLF, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS V. TRUMP, et al
as 2:2019cv04677
Respondent:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, GOV. TOM WOLF and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JENKINS v. WOLF et al
as 2:2019cv04582
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS and DARRELL ANTHONY JENKINS
Respondent:
JUDGE TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE JACQUELYN FRAZIER LYDE, WARDEN JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS et al v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03822
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS and PHYLLIS PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DR. JOHN DOE, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., HANNAH JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNAUSS v. JENKINS
as 2:2019cv03122
Defendant:
C. HALEY JENKINS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KNAUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbin v. Corbin et al
as 2:2019cv02480
Plaintiff:
Kymere Corbin
Defendant:
C/O JENKINS, Julio M. Corbin, MR. PARKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
