Cases 101 - 110 of 218
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv04525
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, CART W. SHRADER, MINDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DOE, ET AL.
as 2:2016cv03949
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NURSE/DOCTOR JOHN DOE/JANE DOE and JOSEPH C. KORSZNIAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01910
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. GIBSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHARLES H. RAMSEY , JOHN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01033
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE ONE THROUGH TEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VFC PARTNERS 26 LLC v. BAILEY SWARTZ et al
as 2:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
VFC PARTNERS 26 LLC
Defendant:
MARGARET T. BAILEY SWARTZ , ROBERT E. BAILEY , JOHN JOSEPH BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
DIAZ v. RUCKER et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA DIAZ
Defendant:
COMER RUCKER, SCOTT PAUL , MICHAEL WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VFC PARTNERS 18 LLC v. GARRETT et al
as 2:2015cv06074
Plaintiff:
VFC PARTNERS 18 LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTY GARRETT, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF CHRISTY GARRETT and JOHN DOE, JANE DOE AND DOE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
VFC PARTNERS 26 LLC v. NUR-DEEN et al
as 2:2015cv06022
Plaintiff:
VFC PARTNERS 26 LLC
Defendant:
SALEEM N. NUR-DEEN, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF SALEEM N. NUR-DEEN and JOHN DOE, JANE DOE AND DOE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
