Cases 121 - 130 of 486
GETTYS v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv01180
Petitioner:
ANWAAR M. GETTYS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ARMEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VICTOR v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNEY v. TICE et al
as 2:2022cv00366
Petitioner:
SILEEN KENNEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WHITE v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2022cv00286
Petitioner:
WALTER WHITE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI HUNTINGDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
TYREE MORRIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, BERNADETTE MASON, CHARLES STETLLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05684
Petitioner:
DARNELL BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05501
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY v. ARMEL
as 2:2021cv05595
Petitioner:
HAKEEM STANLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
