Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Terry v. Ramson et al
as 2:2020cv03521
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, District Attorney of Norristown, PA, Montgomery County, Kevin Ramson and others
Petitioner:
Nathan Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. AFSCME et al
as 2:2017cv03417
Plaintiff:
GARY EDWARD HALL
Defendant:
AFSCME, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00702
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00676
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00680
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00675
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00681
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COATES v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv07401
Petitioner:
GARFIELD NEVILLE COATES
Respondent:
LAMAS, SCIR, DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
as 2:2013mc00155
Petitioner:
DEVON BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: Certified Copy of Order from U.S.C.A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
