Cases 11 - 20 of 161
Martin et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05334
Plaintiff:
Ryan Martin and Ali Martin
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Detective Christopher Sweeney, Lieutenant Waley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell v. Black et al
as 2:2021cv05214
Petitioner:
Breon Powell
Respondent:
WARDEN DUANE BLACK, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2021cv00549
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Billy Duane Allen and Cynthia Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRITTON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04851
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DUANE BRITTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU et al
as 2:2020cv04297
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ATKINS
Defendant:
HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU, OFFICER ERIK HENRY, OFFICER DUANE PYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIETRYGA v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01093
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DUANE PIETRYGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOLMES v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02854
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DUANE MARCEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINK et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05306
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DUANE ELLIS SINK and ANNE KAY SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
