Cases 11 - 20 of 45
WILSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66064
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE E. WILSON and ANDREA WILSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65943
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. WILSON and CAROLYN WILSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEASE OF MEDIA
as 2:2011cv03007
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEASE OF MEDIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIGFORD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
LYNELL DAVON PIGFORD
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON, EARL F. REITZ, JR., JEFF ILGENFRITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54555
Plaintiff:
CORENZA E. WILSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55399
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WILSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78411
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. WILSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71351
Plaintiff:
MILES E. WILSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69352
Plaintiff:
BUDDY R WILSON and NANCY E WILSON
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv63827
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. WILSON
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
