Cases 11 - 20 of 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
AVERY v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv04443
Petitioner:
FRED AVERY, JR.
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. LUPI et al
as 5:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
FRED BUTLER
Defendant:
VICTOR J LUPI and CAROL LUPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GORSTEIN et al v. GLENN et al
as 2:2022cv02487
Plaintiff:
Fred Gorstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PYLE v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv01715
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP, DOMINIC J VENUTI, FRED C RHODES, JR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHOTT, JR. v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SCHOTT, JR.
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP, PFC FRED C RHODES, JR. and UPPER CHICHESTER TOWSHIP PFC FRED C. RHODES, JR. #38
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04389
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
SANDERSON FARMS, INC., FRED BANKS, JR., DAVID BARKSDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
KAISER v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20088
Plaintiff:
FRED KAISER
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
