Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CERCIELLO v. SACRED HEART HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
as 5:2014cv02285
Plaintiff:
MARK J. CERCIELLO
Defendant:
SACRED HEART HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv06441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
REID v. ALBIZEM et al
as 2:2013cv04448
Plaintiff:
WILLETTE REID
Defendant:
HAYTHAM ALBIZEM, GUIDANT CORPORATION and HEART CARE CONSULTANTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
CHARLES v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2013cv04080
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHARLES, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, MARIE PRIBISH, ORPHANS COURT JUDGE ED D. REIBMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv06853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. CHURCH OF THE SACRED HEART
as 2:2012cv06022
Plaintiff:
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
Defendant:
CHURCH OF THE SACRED HEART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
DANBRADE v. CERCIELLO et al
as 5:2012cv05192
Plaintiff:
EFREN DANBRADE
Defendant:
MARK J. CERCIELLO, SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, LEHIGH COUNTY DOC, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REX v. ADMINISTRATION OF SACRED HEART HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2012cv04620
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ALAN REX
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATION OF SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, LORA NARATIL, ELIZABETH YUDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
