Cases 21 - 30 of 91
SUTTON v. OVERMAYER et al
as 2:2015cv06499
Petitioner:
DEREK SUTTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMAYER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA PENNSYLVANIA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOONAN et al v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv06082
Plaintiff:
FRANK NOONAN , RANDY FEATHERS , RICHARD A. SHEETZ, JR. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE , MICHAEL MILETTO , CHRISTOPHER BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv05871
Appellant:
RODMEN R. FOSTER
Appellee:
KATHLEEN KANE, MICHAEL C. POTTEIGER and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05487
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURKHARDT v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2015cv05497
Petitioner:
GEORGE W. BURKHARDT
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, CRAIG W. STEDMAN and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv05375
Petitioner:
TODD A. WILSON
Respondent:
KATHLEEN KANE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA and WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRICE v. OVERMAYER et al
as 2:2015cv05352
Petitioner:
MARVIN PRICE
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMAYER, SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05167
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv05108
Petitioner:
CARL BURTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
