Cases 21 - 30 of 75
SHELLEY v. CAPPOZZI
as 2:2016cv03862
Plaintiff:
LEROY SHELLEY
Defendant:
JOHN CAPPOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COHN v. COHN et al
as 2:2015cv03319
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE SMERCONISH COHN
Defendant:
MARTIN COHN, SHELLEY COHN SCHMIDT and CYNTHIA COHN HIERBAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
MARLENE SLATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT , SHELLEY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05578
Plaintiff:
MASON WYATT STANLEY and SHELLEY ANN FORCE
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, WYETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANCIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02647
Plaintiff:
OMAR FRANCIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, SHELLEY M. DOWDELL, GREGORY BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROW v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02258
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY M. CROW
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELLEY v. CAPUZZI
as 2:2014cv02123
Plaintiff:
LEROY SHELLEY, 3RD
Defendant:
JOHN CAPUZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. EVERETT
as 2:2014cv01682
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN SHELLEY EVERETT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JULE EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GETCHIUS v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2013cv07555
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GETCHIUS
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON , PAUL SMEAL , JOSEPH SHIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARQUEZ et al v. MCMASTERS et al
as 2:2013cv03847
Plaintiff:
GARARDO MARQUEZ and SHELLEY MARQUEZ
Defendant:
ANDREW MCMASTERS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
