Cases 21 - 30 of 107
VASQUEZ v. CDI CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01044
Plaintiff:
JUAN C. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CDI CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04911
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
ANA VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING et al v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS et al
as 5:2019cv00389
Defendant:
WARDEN QUIGLEY, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM SUPERVISOR OFFICIALS and others
Plaintiff:
DEDEON GREEN, CHARLES BETHEH, JERRY LEE WOMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv04999
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON and LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
WALTER VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTESE v. SABATINO et al
as 2:2018cv03804
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, DAMON VASQUEZ, ARTHUR SABATINO and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP OF COMPANIES
as 2:2018cv03756
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP OF COMPANIES
Plaintiff:
NORMA VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GARCIA et al v. WALMART STORES EAST, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv01742
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GARCIA and CARMEN VASQUEZ
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, L.P. , WALMART STORES, INC. , WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VASQUEZ v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00967
Plaintiff:
NORA VASQUEZ
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORREA v. BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv04481
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CORREA
Defendant:
S. BROWN , BLOOM, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES VASQUEZ v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2017cv03284
Petitioner:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
