Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 69
BESSON v. COOK
as 5:2018cv05657
Defendant: APPLE INC. and TIM COOK
Plaintiff: RODNEY BESSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. T-MOBILE STORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04079
Defendant: APPLE, INC., T-MOBILE USA, INC., ASSURANT, INC. and others
Plaintiff: ISHYNIQUE MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff: TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02767
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01404
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. ALBURTIS TAVERN, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv04685
Plaintiff: BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC , RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Defendant: ALBURTIS TAVERN, LLC, TERRY BENDER and HOPE BENDER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02974
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
APPLE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05689
Plaintiff: LEAH APPLE
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2015cv05119
Plaintiff: NATASHA FRANKLIN and JULIAN COLEMAN
Defendant: APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?