Cases 31 - 40 of 283
CAPMAN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20017
Plaintiff:
DONNA CAPMAN and DAVID DERRICK
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. FISHER et al
as 5:2021cv02343
Defendant:
DERRICK FISHER, PATRICK BARRETT, JEREMY SCHOENOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ARTIS v. CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01639
Defendant:
NICHOLAS L KUHAR, PHILLIP M PEAD, BANSI NAGJI and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L ARTIS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ceasar v. Bradley et al
as 2:2021cv01643
Defendant:
CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Dr. Elizabeth Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01469
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL FLORES, ESMANUEL FLORES and ESMAUEL FLORES
Defendant:
ROBERT ROSE, BRUCE HERDMAN, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACOBS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Defendant:
BENJAMN NAISH, DF PACE, DENNIS WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MCCRAY v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv00360
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS COUNTY, PA., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT TICE
Petitioner:
DERRICK MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
