Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 428
FLOYD v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv03166
Petitioner: CALVIN FLOYD
Respondent: CYNTHIA LINK, PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CRIMINAL TRIAL DIVISION and HUGH J. BURNS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02908
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEANDER FLOYD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PATTERSON v. QUIGLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv01604
Plaintiff: FLOYD E. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant: JANINE L. QUIGLEY, KEVIN S. BARNHART, MARK C. SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRAPP-FLOYD v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv01426
Plaintiff: MALIKA S TRAPP-FLOYD
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FLOYD v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01376
Plaintiff: JOYCE OLLIE FLOYD
Defendant: LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. , DAVE SWAGGER and RANDOLPH SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BULLARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff: JAMES FOY BULLARD, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT KELLY, STEVE TOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv00535
Petitioner: HAROLD LEON FLOYD
Respondent: LINK, SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOYD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PA et al
as 2:2015cv06625
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PA and BLOUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06413
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEANDER FLOYD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FLOYD et al v. AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2015cv05792
Plaintiff: EUGENE FLOYD and BARBARA FLOYD
Defendant: AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?