Cases 31 - 40 of 1,425
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ROGERS-ARMSTEAD v. SENSIO, INC.
as 2:2021cv05424
Plaintiff:
DESTINY ROGERS-ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
SENSIO, INC. doing business as BELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COWAN v. KOSTURA et al
as 5:2021cv05557
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COWAN
Defendant:
JAMES C. KOSTURA, MARK T. BARTHOLOMEW, JOHN HARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2021cv05416
Plaintiff:
CRISSY ROGERS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HOPKINS v. ROGERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
ROGERS CORPORATION, BRUCE D HOECHNER, KEITH L BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
TRAVERA v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv05674
Plaintiff:
ROGER TRAVERA
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips RS North America LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Yun et al v. STANFORD
as 2:2021cv04967
Lead Plaintiff:
Esther Yun
Plaintiff:
Soon Wook Yun
Defendant:
ROGER STANFORD and Cody M Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWARTZ v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04330
Plaintiff:
ROGER SWARTZ
Defendant:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMY GUTMANN, SCOTT DIAMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTICE, II v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04607
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
