Cases 31 - 40 of 107
MORALES v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2017cv03254
Plaintiff:
JOSE VASQUEZ MORALES
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, MARIROSA LAMAS and TOMLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv01870
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LITTLE et al v. VASQUEZ et al
as 2:2017cv01562
Plaintiff:
LUCINDA LITTLE , CHERI HONKALA , THE GREEN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Defendant:
EMILIO VASQUEZ, ANTHONY CLARK, AL SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
SUMMERLIN et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03766
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SUMMERLIN , TERRI SUMMERVILLE , TARA SUTPHIN and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv02037
Plaintiff:
MAYRA VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
VASQUEZ-BAEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
EDWIN VASQUEZ-BAEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
VASQUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06630
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LUIS VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RIVERA v. (CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE et al
as 2:2015cv05609
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A RIVERA
Defendant:
(CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE, MARCONI, MATTHEW JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL v. GOV TOM WOLF ETAL
as 2:2015mc00225
Petitioner:
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL
Respondent:
GOV TOM WOLF ETAL
Movant:
JOEZIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2015cv04297
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, ARWIN SANTEE, THOMAS K. FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
