Cases 51 - 60 of 61
NEWSUAN v. CORNEY et al
as 2:2008cv03422
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
CORNEY, GIOLA, BRACTENBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADONAI-ADONI v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2008cv02949
Petitioner:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Respondent:
LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY, GERALD MAY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADONAI-ADONI v. MAY et al
as 2:2008cv01864
Petitioner:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Respondent:
GERALD MAY, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FORNAH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2008cv01262
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED FORNAH and MOHAMED FORNAH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COTO v. GAINEY
as 2:2008cv01283
Petitioner:
AMILCAR COTO
Respondent:
CLYDE GAINEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ADONAI-ADONI v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv05484
Plaintiff:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHS-PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADONAI-ADONI v. AMBRO et al
as 2:2007cv05216
Petitioner:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Respondent:
THOMAS AMBRO, LOUIS POLLAK, LINDA CARACAPPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ROUSE v. BURGESS et al
as 2:2007cv03537
Plaintiff:
ANDRE A. ROUSE, SR.
Defendant:
KARLA BURGESS, PHILA. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, WILLIAM GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JILES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv02894
Plaintiff:
THELMA JILES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KEVIN DAY, JAMES MCCANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. KING et al
as 2:2007cv02180
Plaintiff:
JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
KING and WHORTON GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
