Cases 51 - 60 of 300
Lane v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20239
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Frances Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARVELL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05167
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., PMAB, LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY LANE HARVELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv05045
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PARK LANE MANOR and BAYADA NURSING
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WALTHOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MBMJ PROPERTIES, LLC et al v. MILLVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv05071
Plaintiff:
MBMJ PROPERTIES, LLC and 4450 SHERWOOD LANE, LLC
Defendant:
MILLVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peale et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20122
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speidel, Edna Middleton, James Santo and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LANE v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2018cv02813
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent:
JOSH SHAPIRO, MARK GARMAN and THE LEHIGH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
MELISSA LANE
Defendant:
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE et al v. ZALLIE SUPERMARKET, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05087
Plaintiff:
RALPH LANE and BEVERLY LANE
Defendant:
ZALLIE SUPERMARKET, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRETT v. ANTHONY UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2017cv04204
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ANTHONY UNKNOWN, SALVATORE UNKNOWN, PAUL MARSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
