Cases 61 - 70 of 195
LEFFLER v. CREATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01443
Plaintiff:
AUDREY LEFFLER
Defendant:
CREATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ANDREW TRENTACOSTE, KATHY KUMITIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GRITZ v. LENDTUIT HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRITZ
Defendant:
LENDTUIT HOLDING CORPORATION, FINANCE STORE, INC., FINANCE AGENTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEADE et al v. REYNOLDS
as 2:2015cv05618
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEADE and CERAYSAH TIM
Defendant:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALGADO v. DAWSON et al
as 5:2014cv05620
Plaintiff:
VICTOR SALGADO
Defendant:
TIM PEARSON, BRET EHRICH, ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCHETTI v. DIRENZIO et al
as 2:2015cv04676
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARCHETTI
Defendant:
DIRENZIO, NEWT CONDICT, TIM PLEACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REYNOLDS v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN , RUSSELL J. BONO , CHARLES DOUGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAP v. PRICE RITE CORPORATION (PRC) et al
as 5:2014cv05840
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAP
Defendant:
PRICE RITE CORPORATION (PRC), JON WILTROUT, TIM SABOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORTEZ et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv03144
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE , INSPECTOR X , BACCARAT and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
LEWIS et al v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.
as 2:2014cv01995
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEWIS , ARTHUR STILL , LIZABETH STILL and others
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
