Cases 61 - 70 of 406
YOUNG-HARRISON v. KORSZNIAK et al
as 2:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
ERIC YOUNG-HARRISON
Defendant:
JOSEPH C. KORSZNIAK, WEINER and CHRISTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN-HARRISON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv06029
Plaintiff:
RODELLA BROWN-HARRISON and STEVEN HARRISON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv04678
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
APONTE et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03769
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE APONTE , APRIL ARLOTTA , ELLEN BENNETT and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03547
Plaintiff:
LEE M. HARRISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02458
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PORTER v. CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02252
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN PORTER
Defendant:
CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. , MOHAMMED H. BUDEIR , TIMOTHY J. HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALLE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS et al
as 2:2016cv01811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY CO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN TOWNSON DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
