Cases 61 - 70 of 310
MILLER v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00338
Defendant:
RAINES RAYCEN, GENEVA LONE HILL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
MCDUFFIE v. VARNER et al
as 2:2021cv00161
Defendant:
SGT CURRAN, JOHN DOE #1, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCDUFFIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06515
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE DIXON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv06175
Defendant:
BAYSIDE CONSULTING, LLC, WILLIAM D'AMICO, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
PEARL A ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACMILLAN v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv05917
Defendant:
BAYSIDE CONSULTING, LLC, WILLIAM D'AMICO, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE MACMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEIST v. SOUTHEASTERN VETERANS' CENTER et al
as 5:2020cv05441
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN VETERANS' CENTER, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
JANINE K GEIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMEGAR et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv05328
Defendant:
SHAMAR MANAGEMENT, LLC, CITY OF CHESTER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
KHADIJA REGENE COMEGAR, RALPH FREEMAN and RALPH FREEMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2020cv05115
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, NATHANEIL SMITH, JR., JOHN DOE #3 and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEMBLETON v. MACY'S, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05024
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. l/t/a Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, MACY'S, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE PEMBLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
