Cases 71 - 80 of 82
NUNEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72057
Plaintiff:
ISIDRO NUNEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72056
Plaintiff:
FAUSTO NUNEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33418
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO NUNEZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01380
Plaintiff:
ALBERT NUNEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT MCDONNELL, JR., JEFFREY CJUDIK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. et al v. SHIOMOS et al
as 2:2008cv05382
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., MAUREEN PARRIS, MARGARET BRAY and others
Defendant:
ANN SHIOMOS, NICK SHIOMOS, RIVER PARK HOUSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
NUNEZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2008cv01164
Petitioner:
JOSE NUNEZ
Respondent:
JOHN THOMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NUNEZ v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv67076
Plaintiff:
ERNEST R. NUNEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SAMA v. MONET et al
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
REINALDO SAMA
Defendant:
DAVID MONET and YVONNE NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NUNEZ v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61140
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. NUNEZ, JR., EDDIE J. NUNEZ, JR., EDDIE J. NUNEZ, JR. and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
