Cases 81 - 90 of 1,291
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv03077
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03242
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WHITE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WHITE v. GONZALES et al
as 5:2022cv02361
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE
Defendant:
CARLOS GONZALES and AMANDA BENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORLAMARI v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
KRANTHI GORLAMARI
Defendant:
VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TED WHITE, P. TERENCE KOHLER JR. and others
ALLEN-WHITE v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv02292
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ALLEN-WHITE
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WHITE v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv02213
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN A WHITE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. KELSO et al
as 2:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
CALVIN WHITE
Defendant:
OFFICER JAMES KELSO and BOROUGH OF DARBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. TUNNELL et al
as 2:2022cv02402
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. WHITE
Defendant:
MARK L. TUNNELL and JOHN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. LEADBETTER et al
as 5:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE
Defendant:
JOSH LEADBETTER, DIRECTOR JANINE DONATE and WARDEN KYLE RUSSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
