Cases 1 - 10 of 82
ROBINSON v. PATHWAY TO HOUSING et al
as 2:2024cv01485
Plaintiff:
DARLENE ROBINSON
Defendant:
PATHWAY TO HOUSING, ANDY, SARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
ANDY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, TIM CARVER and CHRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RED LOBSTER RESTAURANTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03843
Defendant:
RED LOBSTER RESTAURANTS LLC, RED LOBSTER and ANDY HARRIS, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHIANNE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
God's Church of Miracles Represented by Rev. James E. Rose, Jr. v. Wright et al
as 2:2022cv04338
Plaintiff:
God's Church of Miracles Represented by Rev. James E. Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Wright and Vinart Dealerships
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
God's Church of Miracles Represented by Rev. James E. Rose, Jr. v. Wright et al
as 5:2022cv04338
Plaintiff:
God's Church of Miracles Represented by Rev. James E. Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Wright and Vinart Dealerships
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Irizarry v. Ransom et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Petitioner:
Andy Irizarry
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. KEEFE COMMISSARY
as 2:2022cv02443
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
COOPERMAN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
ANDY COOPERMAN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
