Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROWLING et al v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
as 2:2021cv04325
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROWLING and LORIE ROWLING
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA and AEROTURN, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
NextGen Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
REAVES v. ROWLES et al
as 2:2021cv00166
Defendant:
JOE DOE, O.E. ROWLES, ROBERT EVANCHICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYERS et al v. FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv03207
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. BARNES, CODY KING, SAMUEL L. SMITH and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, ABC CORPORATIONS (A-Z), FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wilson-Holland v. R.E. ROWLES ASPHALT & SEALING CO. et al
as 2:2020cv01806
Defendant:
Kvibtk Knowlfs, R.E. ROWLES ASPHALT & SEALING CO. and Rodger Rowles
Plaintiff:
Isaac Wilson-Holland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCRACKEN v. EVANCHICK et al
as 2:2019cv01860
Defendant:
JANE DOE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. ROWLES et al
as 2:2018cv01738
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A. YOUNG
Defendant:
ADAM ROWLES, BARRY SMITH and GALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2014mc00225
Movant:
JEFFREY A. POTT , RICHARD S. BARKER , TERRI L. BOWMAN and others
Respondent:
ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAMS v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2013cv07158
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. EMPLOYEES, WILLIAMS SMINKEY, MIKE PECKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLES v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv91624
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H ROWLES
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
