Cases 1 - 10 of 40
MOSLEY v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 2:2024cv03833
Defendant:
ELI J. VONNEGUT, TIMOTHY GRAUDICH, PURDUE PHARMA LP ET. AL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW OFFICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
POLK v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv00424
Plaintiff:
JOEL MAURICE POLK
Defendant:
MIKE NUTTER, GIORLA, WARDEN OF C.F.C.F. 2012 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06250
Plaintiff:
JOEL MAURICE POLK
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPIKES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05606
Plaintiff:
IRVING SPIKES , JENNIFER SPIKES , STEVE BOWMAN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
POLK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN POLK
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
