Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BRILL v. EINFALT #477 et al
as 5:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRILL
Defendant:
OFC. MADISYN EINFALT #477, OFC. JEREMY BANKS #472, OFC. ROBERT CONSTABLE #442 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRILL et al
as 2:2020cv01853
Defendant:
HARRY HAROLD BRILL, III and LAURIE BRILL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
KARKALAS v. MARKS et al
as 2:2019cv00948
Defendant:
LINDA MARKS and KIMBERLY BRILL
Plaintiff:
ELIAS KARKALAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCKENNA v. MIGNELLA et al
as 5:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. MCKENNA
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. MIGNELLA, MICHAEL SHALE, TIMOTHY VANHISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VURIMINDI v. HSFLB CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant:
HSFLB CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CYRUS et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv07278
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. CYRUS, DAVID BRILL and ALBERTO GARCIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 2:2010cv57217
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. BRILL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CREDICO v. SPRAGUE et al
as 2:2010cv05414
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
DAVID SPRAGUE, JOE MILLIGAN, JIM FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
