Cases 1 - 10 of 33
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JESSE CALLOWAY IV
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
JESSE CALLOWAY IV and JESSE CALLOWAY, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02048
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv04565
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv04216
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
REASON v. HASSMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE et al
as 2:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
MELVIN REASON, JR.
Defendant:
GREGORY CALLOWAY, HASSMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE and ROBERT M. SLIMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALLOWAY v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2018cv05133
Respondent:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, SCI-COAL TOWNSHIP and ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
EDMOND CALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
