Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROBERTSON v. FENICO et al
as 2:2016cv01928
Plaintiff:
MALIK ROBERTSON
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN J. FENICO, ANTOINE J. HAYES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv05591
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISONS, CFCF and DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON et al v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv03275
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOHNSON and NICOLE BRACY-JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02923
Plaintiff:
LEON FIELDS , TAMYRA FIELDS , TIMOTHY JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAMIEN STEVENSON, K. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv01057
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOHNSON
Defendant:
E. MCFADDEN , JACK HEALY , PRIME CARE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. FOX et al
as 2:2008cv05275
Petitioner:
ERIC JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN B. FOX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
