Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Paydhealth, LLC v. Holcombe
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Paydhealth, LLC
Defendant:
Dawn G Holcombe doing business as DGH Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
HOLCOMB v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
GLYNDA HOLCOMB
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCHAFFER v. HOLCOMB ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 2:2016cv04375
Plaintiff:
MARY LOUISE SCHAFFER
Defendant:
HOLCOMB ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOLCOMB v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06834
Plaintiff:
ADANO HOLCOMB
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SEAN CAVE and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLCOMB v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv05776
Petitioner:
HAROLD HOLCOMB
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TRAYNOR-LUFKIN et al v. TWEEN BRANDS, INC.
as 2:2015cv02712
Plaintiff:
KATIE TRAYNOR-LUFKIN , TERRI HOLCOMB , DORLENE GOLDMAN and others
Defendant:
TWEEN BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDDER et al v. PHELAN HALLINAN AND SCHMEIG et al
as 2:2011cv07650
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FEDDER and TRACEY HENDRY
Defendant:
PHELAN HALLINAN AND SCHMEIG, NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE L.L.C., LISA HOLCOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOLCOMB v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57526
Plaintiff:
CURTIS B. HOLCOMB
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLCOMB v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv57525
Plaintiff:
CURTIS B. HOLCOMB
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
