Cases 1 - 10 of 92
ROBINSON v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2023cv04774
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
Kevin Hutchinson individually and doing business as UBREAKIFIX BY ASURION, OFFICER RYAN M. WIEGAND and East Lampeter Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TORRENCE v. HUTCHINSON
as 2:2022cv05262
Petitioner:
TYRAIL TORRENCE
Respondent:
J. HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FOSTER v. SLOMSKY et al
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CLERKS TO BE NAMED, LANDON Y. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTCHINSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
as 5:2022cv02652
Plaintiff:
RAMEL HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUTCHINSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02605
Plaintiff:
MADELINE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
