Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CAPPEL et al v. ASTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
KEISHA CAPPEL, ALFONSO JONES and The Estate of Tamika Jones
Defendant:
ASTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF ASTON, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. WALLACE et al
as 2:2021cv02808
Defendant:
KEISHA WALLACE, JOHN DOE, LT. H. PATTON and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MCINTYRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christmas v. Mills et al
as 2:2021cv01808
Defendant:
Mark Mills, Keisha Boyer, Keith Boyer, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Terreza Christmas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAMARA PRYOR, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv05532
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA AIRPORT, WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TAMARA PRYOR, and Keisha Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
