Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MYERS v. HARRY
as 2:2023cv04594
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
LAUR HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. FOLEREZELL
as 2:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
DR. FOLEREZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA., W LOUIS/SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brenen et al v. VBIT Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brenen, Rebecca Brenen, Sonny Eslampour and others
Defendant:
VBIT Technologies Corporation, VBIT MINING LLC, ADVANCED MINING GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MYERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv02720
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS and MICHAEL LEE MYERS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MYERS v. SEFAH LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01956
Defendant:
SEFAH LLC and SEFIK GUNAYDIN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MYERS v. READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2016cv03756
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01424
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULCH BLOWER EXPRESS, LLC v. POPPALARDO et al
as 2:2009cv03994
Plaintiff:
MULCH BLOWER EXPRESS, LLC
Defendant:
DOUG POPPALARDO, SHARLEEN POPPALARDO, BIOME LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
