Cases 1 - 10 of 11,087
MILLER v. BARLEY et al
as 5:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN MILLER
Defendant:
JAY BARLEY and CHRISTINE BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MILLER v. BARLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN MILLER
Defendant:
JAY BARLEY and CHRISTINE BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner:
STEVEN MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DOE v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
STEVENS-NUNEZ v. BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
KAREN MARIE STEVENS-NUNEZ
Defendant:
BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, JAMES DILLON, CHIEF JOSEPH MOORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MATHIS v. MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
OLAMAE MATHIS
Defendant:
MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRETZIK v. KOVALCHIK et al
as 5:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
GERALD ROBERT BRETZIK
Defendant:
JOSEPH KOVALCHIK, JAMES CHUSS, MICHAEL BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
