Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LEWIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04259
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2015cv03092
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RETZLER v. LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2014cv04718
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
DENNIS LEIGHTON, JAMES P. MCANDREW, KEVIN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEWIS v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv04693
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2014cv03433
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDEL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02134
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS KENDEL
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
LEWIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv31173
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2010cv68692
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS and COSTELLA LEWIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , FIBREBOARD CORP. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS YOUNG
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CAIN v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65854
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEWIS CAIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, THE BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
