Cases 1 - 10 of 8,150
JOHN FYNES, ET AL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv03398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FYNES and MARYANN FYNES
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., Bayer Cropscience, INc. (f/k/a Aventis CropScience USA Inc., f/k/a Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Inc., a/k/a Amchem Products, Inc.) unknown Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. unknown Am, CBS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,, CONWED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HOWARD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARTIN M. HOWARD
Cross Claimant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CORNING, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, CRANE COMPANY, EATON CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, GTE OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., THE OKONITE COMPANY and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS and MIGHTY AUTO PARTS WESTERN NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
TRELLA v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP et al
as 2:2021cv05024
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE FORMERLY KNOWN AS AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, AJAX MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TRELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TRELLA v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP et al
as 5:2021cv05024
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TRELLA and LUCILLE TRELLA
Cross Defendant:
JH FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY and KEELER/DOOR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
STALMACH et al v. ABB, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Defendant:
INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH F. STALMACH and KIMBERLY S. STALMACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv05656
Not Classified By Court:
JEFF SCHLICHTING
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, WARREN PUMPS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHEERON v. AURORA PUMP COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv04669
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA SHIP MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC., SPIRAX SARCO, INC., BRISTOL PENN JERSEY, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
VIKING PUMP, INC., GOULDS PUMPS LLC, J.H FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE J. SHEERON and DETECTIVE MARTIN SHEERON
Cross Claimant:
BW/IP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BRADLEY et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv02513
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, LLC, AURORA PUMP, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER CO., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BRADLEY and KENNETH E. BRADLEY
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WILLIAMS v. AGCO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01755
Defendant:
PREMIER BRANDS OF AMERICA INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARION PASKIN WILLIAMS
Cross Defendant:
KME FIRE APPARATUS, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, NAVISTAR INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
FINELLO v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03584
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AURORA PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
EILEEN BRODERICK, ALFRED C. BRODERICK and ANTHONY FINELLO
Cross Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CARRIER CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, CLEAVER BROOKS, TRANE US INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
