Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TEMPEST v. EMEIGH et al
as 2:2021cv03346
Plaintiff:
JOANNE TEMPEST
Defendant:
SCOTT EMEIGH, JUSTIN HOOD, PATRICK J DAWE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
STONE v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2018cv01705
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN STONE
Defendant:
FRANCES W. THOMAS and FRANCINE THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
W. et al v. THOMAS
as 2:2018cv00569
Plaintiff:
JANE W. , JOHN X. , JOHN Y. and others
Defendant:
MOSES W. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
DUCKWORTH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv04231
Plaintiff:
BOBBY DUCKWORTH , VINCE ALBRITTON , FRED ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relation
THOMAS et al v. THE FAIRFAX AT EMBASSY ROW et al
as 2:2012cv05530
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON H. THOMAS, JR. and SUSAN W. THOMAS
Defendant:
THE FAIRFAX AT EMBASSY ROW and STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TIRPAK et al
as 2:2012cv02399
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK , CRAIG W. THOMAS , JOHN S. IOANNOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. PA. SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2011cv02409
Petitioner:
ROBERT W. THOMAS
Respondent:
PA. SUPREME COURT, JEROME WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOOLEY v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2011cv02255
Plaintiff:
W. THOMAS DOOLEY
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TIRPAK et al
as 2:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK, CRAIG W. THOMAS and PETER A. MICHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
