Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WHITFIELD v. TEGNA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TENGA, INC., HOWARD D ELIAS, DAVE LOUGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
NAZARIO v. SUNSTATE LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Defendant:
HEIDI WITMER, JAMES H. COFIELD, SUNSTATE LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS NAZARIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WITMER et al v. NAZARIO et al
as 5:2020cv01247
Defendant:
JAMES H. COFIELD, NICHOLAS NAZARIO, JR., ABC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER POPE and HEIDI WITMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSS v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2019cv04733
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, POLICE OFFICER ISAAC WITMER, POLICE OFFICER JOEL THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUMMEL v. WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv01111
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN GUMMEL
Defendant:
WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LOSCO et al v. POWELSON et al
as 2:2015cv02798
Plaintiff:
COSMO LOSCO , MARYANNE LOSCO and CD LOSCO, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT F. POWELSON, JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR., JAMES H. CAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AT&T CORP. et al v. CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07157
Plaintiff:
AT&T CORP. and TCG PITTSBURGH
Defendant:
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ROBERT F. POWELSON , JOHN F. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act of 1934
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WITMER
as 5:2011cv05349
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAULA C. WITMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
