Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Ramey v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv01018
Defendant:
Dr. Kollman, Lt. Deloite, Captain Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. McDanial et al
as 1:2021cv00935
Amicus Curiae:
Hodge Prison Administration Supervisor
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Karen Pyle, Ms. Auderey A. England, Dr. Saraha Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Squires v. Peslis et al
as 3:2021cv00690
Defendant:
Another Officer, RHU Officers, C.O. 1 Peslis and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Squires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Coleen Orzel, The Dentist, Derek Lavelle and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv01621
Defendant:
Sec. Wetzel, Perrigo(R) Manufacturer, Clay Pharmaceutical and others
Plaintiff:
Lavon Cecil Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark, Jr. v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2020cv01402
Defendant:
Sgt. Schwartz, Superintendent at SCI-Camp Hill and Medical Department at SCI-Camp Hill
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Clark, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Deborah Fryer, R. Miller, Wexford Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Whiting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Salois v. SCI Rockview Medical Department
as 1:2019cv00993
Defendant:
SCI Rockview Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Claude Salois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waters v. Huntingdon State Correction, PA et al
as 1:2018cv01895
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Waters
Defendant:
Huntingdon State Correction, PA, Dental Department of SCI Huntingdon, Dr. Petz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2018cv01390
Defendant:
Warden Brian Clark, Dr. Young, Dauphin County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
