Cases 21 - 30 of 210
Brown et al v. The Gap Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Quashae Brown and Quanae Brown
Defendant:
The Gap Inc., Marygrace Kepple, Dennis Eckenrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Action Lab Entertainment et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Tom Rogers
Defendant:
Action Lab Entertainment and Bryan Seaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Talbert v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01906
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Tom Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neff v. Commissioners of Schuylkill County Halcovage, Bender & Hess et al
as 3:2021cv00993
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph Groody, President Judge Baldwin, District Attorney O'Pake and others
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff, Laura Johnson, Angelica Maready and others
Amicus Curiae:
Dillon Kamant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tisdale et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2021cv00192
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and Rachel Levine
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tisdale, Anton McCullough and Emery Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Scott W. Walters, John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage et al v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv02354
Defendant:
John Doe I, Tom Wolf, Jake Griesemer and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Savage and Stacy Renee Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
