Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Black v. The City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
Antoine M. Black
Defendant:
The City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Harrisburg City Police Department, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Monfredo
as 1:2014cv00788
Plaintiff:
Antoine M. Black
Defendant:
Vincent M. Monfredo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxton v. Black et al
as 1:2013cv01894
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Lisa Black, Naren Masser and P. Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pleasants v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2013cv01611
Plaintiff:
April Pleasants
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Corey D. O'Brien, James Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mecca v. Black et al
as 3:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
Shawna Mecca
Defendant:
Joseph Black, Murray, Robert McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jack Leroy Black
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Forshey v. Huntingdon County et al
as 1:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Brian Forshey
Defendant:
Huntingdon County , Huntingdon County Commissioners , Huntingdon County Prison Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Black et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Raheem A. Nelson
Defendant:
Duane Black, Darrell Bair, Susan Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gwilym v. Huntingdon County Prison/Jail et al
as 1:2012cv02508
Plaintiff:
Ralph D. Gwilym, Jr.
Defendant:
Duane Black, Darrell Bair, Susan Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janickey v. Black et al
as 1:2012cv01782
Plaintiff:
Richard M Janickey
Defendant:
Black, Bair, Rosevear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
