Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Reese v. Lesnichin et al
as 3:2015cv01772
Plaintiff:
Debra Reese
Defendant:
Sergey Lesnichin and Arka Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese et al v. Papertec, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00323
Plaintiff:
James Reese and Terry Reese
Defendant:
Papertec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. SCI - Huntingdon et al
as 3:2015cv00125
Petitioner:
Francis Ordean Reese
Respondent:
SCI - Huntingdon and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Realty Counseling Company et al
as 1:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Realty Counseling Company, Jim Sprout, Anesburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act
Teaster et al v. O&S Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00656
Plaintiff:
Norman L. Teaster and Rita Teaster
Defendant:
O&S Trucking, Inc. and Laura Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammonds v. Walsh et al
as 3:2011cv01666
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Jerome Walsh, Fathy Brittian, Norm Demming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Of America v. 389-391 North Main Street, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2011cv00917
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
389-391 North Main Street, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania and 102-104 Reese Street, Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
DeWitt v. Delaware Valley School District et al
as 3:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeWitt
Defendant:
Delaware Valley School District , Joseph Casmus , Christopher Pietraszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucarelli v. Barth et al
as 3:2010cv01768
Plaintiff:
Charles Lucarelli
Defendant:
Richard Barth and Patrick Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
