Cases 41 - 50 of 544
Roher v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Steven Roher and Steven K. Roher
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cech v. Sage
as 1:2022cv00715
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Cech
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boggs v. Geletti
as 4:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Steven Boggs
Defendant:
Superintendent Briggs, Prime Care, Diane Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundy v. Brittain et al
as 1:2022cv00578
Petitioner:
Steven Love Lundy
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain, The District Attorney of the County of Monroe and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moffa v. Yellen et al
as 1:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Francisco Michael Moffa
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Chales Rettig and Steven Muchin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEVENS v. MONROE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, MONROE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and LT. SUSAN CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Pannebaker v. Trotta et al
as 1:2021cv02168
Plaintiff:
Steven Pennebaker and Steven Pannebaker
Defendant:
Karin Trotta, Eric Smith and John Steinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
