Cases 41 - 50 of 51,839
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Jackson v. Walker Advertising, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Walker Advertising, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Desmoulin v. USP-Lewisburg
as 1:2024cv00930
Petitioner:
Lester Desmoulin
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roldan v. Greene
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner:
Angel Roldan
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chi v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell, Stephen Marte, Even McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arzola v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Angelica Arzola
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Penn State Health and Health and Welfare Plan for Employees of Penn State Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pietryka et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
David E. Pietryka, Helen Pietryka and David P. Pietryka
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
