Cases 71 - 80 of 51,705
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv00491
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Jessica Sage and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huber v. Safeco Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Ali Huber
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Andrews v. Talutto et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Talutto, Warden Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kline v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cynthia Ann Allen and Coverage One Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Paul Walters
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Harrisburg Bureau of Police and CPL. Donald Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
Secretary Harry, Deputy Secretary Bickell, Deputy Secretary Wenorwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Juanita Gantt
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Comer v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Comer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
