Cases 81 - 90 of 169
Brown v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown
Defendant:
Middletown Borough, Paul Leggore, John & Jane Doe Central Booking Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sokalsky v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv02146
Defendant:
Corrections Officer George Calpin, Deputy Warden David Langan, Corrections Officer Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Sokalsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv01924
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, John/Jane Doe's (1-52), Robert Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmitessa v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv01462
Defendant:
Loreen Cummings, Robert Eagen, John/Jane Doe County Employees I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Palmitessa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubino v. Lackawann County et al
as 3:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
Autumn Rubino
Defendant:
Lackawann County , Lackawanna County Prison Board , Tim Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Credico v. Parkin et al
as 3:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Defendant:
Parkin and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tejada v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2018cv01096
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
Delbalso, Juksta, Hinnan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
